

A fall 2005
meeting with James G. Robinson, the head of the production company Morgan
Creek, would seal the production deal. Levinson and the producer had known
one another for decades, but not worked together on a project. Over lunch,
Levinson discussed his screenplay, Man of the Year, and the two agreed that
Robin Williams signing on to play the lead role would galvanize Levinson’s
idea into a green-lit film. Robinson responded to the fact that “the script
is a reflection of our culture. Tom Dobbs is an honest everyman who has some
very big decisions to make about the power that’s been granted to him.”
The producer
felt audiences would enjoy not only the sometimes dry, often ribald, humor
but also the film’s “innocence and optimism. Humans are by our very nature
optimists, and we want to believe things can get better.” That doesn’t stop
him from admitting, however, that the film should very much make fun of
politics and politicians. “Sometimes you have to bring ’em down to Earth a
bit,” Robinson chuckles.
Levinson has
often written the films he has directed, including such personal titles as
Diner and Avalon. The director comments he enjoys the flexibility that comes
with pulling double duty on his movies. “At a certain point, you try not to
make a distinction between whether you are the writer or the director,” he
says. “As a director, however, it’s an advantage to be able to fiddle and
make changes more quickly than if you are the writer only.”
He created a
central character in Tom Dobbs that would allow his audience to not only
laugh at the hypocrisy of the political process but also challenge
themselves as participatory members of their government. “Tom finds ways to
allow humor in, so discussing accountability and responsibility becomes more
palatable,” the filmmaker offers.
For his
comedian-turned-contender, Levinson wrote about a man who—once he realizes
that he’s an actual candidate—retains his comic roots. After Tom understands
he has a legitimate voice in the process, he jumps at the chance to shake up
the system. But he begins to sound like the clone candidates with empty
vows. Levinson reflects, “It’s only when Tom comes back to his real
essence—his comedy—that he suddenly has credibility.” And that’s when the
humor, not the preaching, takes center stage in the film.
“The
point of the movie is that it’s not about liberals, conservatives, Democrats
or Republicans,” Levinson continues. “There is something wrong in a system
when people begin to feel disconnected as if there isn’t some type of
representation. Dobbs is saying, ‘We have bigger problems. We don’t seem to
have leadership. We don’t have the guidance necessary. The average Joe
doesn’t feel his government is responding to his needs.’” And a likeable
comic actor like Williams is just the one to deliver the message. Theme and
funding set, the production team was next off to find just the right actors
to play rabble-rousers, pundits and agog voting techs.
Levinson knows
there is a distinct reason why Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert and Bill Maher
have amassed devoted audiences who tune in nightly to get their takes on
life in our country: viewers like a fresh take on the silliness that often
permeates politics…delivered by very sarcastic, funny people. It makes news
relatable and real. When it came time to cast the film, Levinson had some of
his players already chosen in his mind, while casting other roles had eluded
him. As a director, he feels he is simply “an orchestra conductor. As
different as the individual sounds are, it’s my job to get all of the
sections to play together. You always want the audience to be fascinated by
the performance.”
When selecting
his players, Levinson admits that he has learned from past experience that
his films functioned best when there was a “controlled freedom” on the set,
and he needed trained actors who could well thrive in that setting. “I don’t
like to inhibit actors up front. I want them to fully explore their
characters.” His on-set attitude is to give his performers a script in which
he feels completely confident, while interestingly providing a structured
environment where the actors feel “there are no controls presented at all.”
Of Levinson’s choices, producer James G. Robinson says, “Casting is dead on
for the film. When it comes to choosing and directing actors, I’ve never
seen anyone better than Barry.”
Interestingly, in the first few drafts of Man of the Year, Williams was not
Levinson’s inspiration to play his sharp-tongued comic. “Originally, I had
much more of a Nader-like character in mind. But I thought, ‘That doesn’t
give me enough to play with.’ And then I considered a late-night talk-show
host type, a Jon Stewart. I thought, ‘That’s more fun to work with.’ And
then Robin came to mind.”
Levinson and Williams had long been familiar with one another’s style. “I’ve
known Robin for years, so I write the way I would hear him speak. I think,
‘I can make this livelier, lift it off the carpet a bit and play with it.’
But the heart of the film is a serious premise with a character who has the
ability to be humorous. Dobbs doesn’t take a sitcom approach to the world
he’s entered.”
Discussing his leading man, Levinson notes, “Robin reads everything he can
about what’s going on in the world. He’s smart enough that you can picture
him running in politics. Blending into this character a guy who can be
extremely funny, smart and serious makes for a formidable person and
performance.”
Williams was interested to work with his old friend as soon as they
discussed the project. According to the actor, he responded to the theme
that “Barry’s main point is that politicians distract you with emotional
issues while avoiding actual ones.” Williams felt he could do justice to Tom
Dobbs, a man he felt wanted to “run using whatever celebrity he had to draw
people into talking about the issues again.”
The
actor also liked his character’s 180-degree behavioral turn once Dobbs
realizes he has left one of his most powerful weapons behind on the campaign
trail: humor. In a pivotal moment during the debate, Dobbs turns to the
incumbent and his fellow challenger and fully lets loose his wickedly funny
arsenal of jokes. Audiences have responded to this scene in early screenings
with vocal enthusiasm, cheering what they have never quite witnessed in real
life.
With the influx
of entertainers commenting on and entering the political arena, Williams
agreed Man of the Year could explore very timely territory. He says, “Al
Franken runs for state senate in Minnesota. Dennis Miller, at one point,
floated the idea of running for California senator. I think the guy from
Dukes of Hazzard was actually a congressman. Are you voting for the
celebrity or the person?”
For Williams,
the message of the movie is simply: “Look around you. Engage your mind when
you vote!” The actor has long used comedy to bring attention to social
issues, including his decades-long affiliation with Comic Relief, one of the
primary national fundraisers for America’s homeless. He feels comedians have
a unique opportunity to satirize without alienating the majority of their
audience. “Politically minded comics like Jon Stewart or Bill Maher simply
point out the contradictions in our government, and that make you laugh,” he
relates.
While it is
often written in production notes about a director and actor, truly the
first person Levinson considered for the role of the dutiful voting tech
Ellie was actor Laura Linney. “Laura has a smart and serious side,” the
filmmaker contends. “There’s something about her in which she can pull off
humor without pushing it. I thought she could play a formidable character
and not just a victim…someone who has a certain integrity.”
The
Oscar®-nominated actor was intrigued by the project because “it’s a great
character-driven piece.” Linney enjoyed the fact that playing opposite
Williams was easy because he “acts with you as opposed to acting at you.
It’s not a razzmatazz, manic comedian thing…he’s terribly connected to
everyone around him,” she shares. The director was adamant that Tom Dobbs’
sounding board and manager not be the typical show business type seen in
movies of the past…complete with clichéd trappings of heavy jewelry and
manic screaming. “I thought of Christopher Walken as a
producer/manager/mentor who would give an interesting dynamic to Robin as
Tom. He brings a very fresh look to it all.”
Oscar® winner Walken spoke with Levinson about the creation of his character
before production began. He offers, “I’ve been in show business my whole
life. Comedy is very good business, and I felt that Menken and I had a great
deal in common—we believe in comedy.”
Regarding his
choice of actor Lewis Black for the part of Dobbs’ head writer, the director
says, “I interviewed him for a previous project, but I didn’t have a role
that was right for him then. I was thinking of him when I wrote this draft,
and fortunately, the timing was great. You can see from the way Lewis’ mind
works how he could write certain jokes for Dobbs to say.”
Black bluntly puts it, “I’m like Lassie as an actor. There’s a certain range
that I’m in. If you want a collie, you get Lassie. If you want a German
shepherd, you get Rin Tin Tin. If you want somebody who is cranky and angry,
you look for me. Isn’t that good?” He deadpans, “Well, the Actors Studio
loved that f*^%&^$ answer.”
Also important
to the filmmaker was to infuse Man of the Year with a suspenseful sub-plot,
as Eleanor is hunted by the very company that she used to serve, Delacroy
Voting Systems. To round out his cast, for the lead attorney of the
manipulative Delacroy, Levinson knew he did not want to create a character
who was a true, stereotypical villain. Rather, he wanted to explore
“business people caught in a situation that gets out of hand. They’re trying
to protect a company worth billions of dollars.” For the role of Delacroy’s
chief legal counsel, the director would choose an actor who could blend sly
humor and sarcasm with a villainous tint better than anyone: Jeff Goldblum.
“I had seen Jeff in the play Pillow Man after I had written the script for
this film,” recalls Levinson. “I wondered if this character would intrigue
him. Fortunately, it did.”
Goldblum, who
had acted in the classic Annie Hall with fellow Man of the Year castmate
Christopher Walken, is a keen political follower and found Levinson’s script
timely and full of relatable comedy. After the director approached him with
the role of the devious Alan Stewart, Goldblum found he couldn’t say no. A
welcome addition to the film, as James G. Robinson refers to the affable
actor as a “prince to work with.” Now off to production, the cast and crew
were ready to keep warm laughing while attempting not to freeze in the icy
winds of the Northeast.
Design And Style Of The Film
Filming
for Man of the Year commenced on November 28, 2005, and wrapped on February
11, 2006. The majority of the comedy was lensed in the Northeast, and key
principal photography occurred in New York City and the District of Columbia
to capture the signature shots available in the two capitals that helped
fashion American democracy. Above all, Levinson felt two things were crucial
to setting the tone of the film: specific camera work and balance of improv
with his carefully scripted comedy. He chose British cinematographer Dick
Pope to give a documentary-style feel to the production, and he worked with
his actors, particularly Williams, to get the perfect level of scripted and
improv jokes that would make the comedy feel seamless.
Pope, a longtime
collaborator of Mike Nichols, comes from a documentary filmmaking
background. Levinson’s interest in working with his DP to shoot the film
with handheld cameras allowed them to keep the momentum going while Tom
Dobbs plugged along on the campaign trail, speaking on stage to an audience
or one on one on his American tour. This decision often allowed Pope and
Levinson to eliminate the need to stop and fix film.
The director didn’t want an overly produced look or slickly shot visuals for
the comedy, rather he wanted to tell the story organically. Together with
Pope and production designer Stefania Cella, the team created sequences that
were more evening news than sweeping drama. “I didn’t want a film that’s
very handsome looking,” notes Levinson. “That would not be correct to the
type of movie we are doing. It would work against this project.”
The weather on set would not always cooperate for the players. Shooting in
the Northeast region of the U.S. during the dead of winter led to many
bitter cold days for the production. “Laura was running around in pajamas
and a coat for part of the movie,” recalls Levinson. For the scenes where
she had to make a quick getaway from her motel, the crew was shooting in
temperatures that were three degrees below zero.
Fortunately,
Levinson wasn’t one to dawdle in the freezing winter weather while he took
signature shots. “We did a lot of work in the cold,” recalls Lewis Black.
“We’re walking across this tarmac to a plane in a scene where Tom Dobbs’
team boards a plane. After the first take, we were out of there. Barry’s
good at getting it right the first time.”
Producer James
G. Robinson also liked the shooting style ways of his director.
“He’s a pro,” Robinson notes. “Barry’s not afraid to say, ‘This seemed like
a good idea yesterday. Maybe today we should shoot it differently.’”
Laura Linney
had a particularly interesting scene for an actor as cinematographer Pope
captured her “meltdown” in long, extended sequences. Out to disprove Ellie
as a psychotic, her company, Delacroy, hires a thug to dose her with a
cocktail that would send the voting tech into a spinning rampage in the
company cafeteria. “It was quite fun,” Linney offers. “Films are not like
plays where you must consistently keep your body warm and keep ‘actor fit.’
If you have an opportunity to work in front of the camera all day long on a
big chunk…grab it, do it.”
To prepare his actors for the shoot, Levinson asked they watch the 1992
debate with the then-incumbent George H.W. Bush, Texas billionaire Ross
Perot and a young Arkansas governor by the name of Bill Clinton. Williams
recalls of the session how he was struck that Perot came out very strong and
Clinton strategically chose to not become defensive, winning him the debate.
“Clinton dealt with questions directly, honestly and the others seemed
lost,” offers Williams. This would prove a valuable lesson he would take
into his character of Dobbs.
While the
majority of the shoot was scripted, Levinson would play around with improv,
especially for Williams. “When you have a political candidate in front of an
audience, you want to take advantage of spontaneity,” Levinson offers. “You
have to create that when drafting the script because you want to make it
seem as if everything was made up. Improvisational moments have to fit in so
well that you can’t tell them from the scripted moments.”
Directing a rapid-fire comic like Williams was old hat for the director.
With a history that spans over 20 years, Levinson notes of his star,
“Robin’s like a Ferrari. He can’t always be in full motion. A lot of times
you need him to just idle. Then sometimes you have to say, ‘Hit the gas and
take off.’ When he’s in front of an audience, he does that.”
Capturing
Williams’ signature style was, according to the filmmaker, akin to the two
playing football on a sandlot. “It’s not what you might call free
improvisation,” Levinson offers. “Between takes, Robin and I would walk
through ideas and tweak them. I’d say, ‘Listen, if you go out here, I’ll
throw this ball over.’ I’d throw out some ideas and so would he. Some get
into his head, then, he’s off to explore those concepts to make them funny.”
He continues, “Whenever we took a break between sets, Robin would stay and
start talking and fooling around with the audience until we were ready to
shoot again. For him, it’s not an effort. It feeds him, and there’s no
reason to try and stop that.”
“Barry is a comic,” Williams returns. “He understands funny, political humor
and setting things up without putting a lot of spin on them. He’ll pick the
best of our work, and that’s what’s comforting as a comic and an actor.”
Principal photography wrapped, editing finished and cast and crew fully
thawed, the two old friends had a bit of time to reflect on the film they’d
created and the state of American politics and comedy in fall of 2006.
Williams
proposes that “in the process of doing comedy, we try and talk about these
issues and still be funny. We’re pushing the idea of democracy, but we’ve
lost track of the idea that it is participatory.” Of that perceived
disinterest in the process, he shares, “I hope this film snaps people out of
our national boredom. I want us to vote for someone inspiring and
charismatic, someone who can make unpopular decisions and help us join the
21st century rather than trying to roll back to the Norman Rockwell years.”
It is important
to Levinson that the film both provides a message and gives a positive slant
to the world he views. The filmmaker concludes, “A lot of times when we make
political pieces, there’s a tendency to be cynical. At the heart and soul of
this film, you have two people, neither of whom could be corrupted.” He
liked the idea that “some man with integrity, some woman with integrity will
both step forward, and that will be the beginning of change. I want to
celebrate that somewhere in human nature, virtue rises up. The alternative
is unimaginable.”
